Wednesday, November 8, 2017

GUNS DON’T KILL PEOPLE:






BULLETS KILL PEOPLE





With two mass shootings over the last five weeks you would think that the Congress would move to address the issue of the ability of disturbed people to easily commit mass carnage. 



But then again, after 27 children were killed in Sandy Hook Elementary School and the Congress did nothing, why should we expect any different now?

I honestly feel that the focus on assault weapons is a distraction.   Semiautomatic rifles have been used by hunters for almost one hundred years; and the assault rifle is simply a semiautomatic rifle dressed up to look like a man killer. 




 

The problem is the capacity of the clip.   In Maine, hunting rifles have historically been limited to a clip size of five rounds.   Five rounds of ammunition are enough to hunt any large game animal in America and more than enough to protect your home. 

At the church slaughter in Texas the killer fired approximately 450 rounds of ammunition.   If clip sizes were limited to five rounds he would have had to reload 90 times. 

A federal law limiting clip size, a buy back and a stiff fine and imprisonment for possession of a large capacity clip would not stop disturbed people from committing acts of terror; but it would limit their ability to commit mass murder – and it would still allow the bad-ass wannabees to sport their assault weapons. 



All the males who feel their manhood depends on being seen carrying a ‘man killer’ rifle could still play their game; but the ability of their weapon to commit mass carnage would be greatly decreased - and lives would be saved.   







Common sense restrictions to control gun violence will never happen as long as Republican lawmakers are in control of Congress 

the Ol'Buzzars






6 comments:

  1. Harm reduction would be better than no action at all, that's for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's logical and reasonable. The problem with this issue (in THIS country), any mention of any kind of restriction is immediately labeled as a violation of individual rights by the opposition, and the red-faced shouting begins. And then there's the goddamn NRA.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are so right about the clips. That's what we need to focus on.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I believe New York State has a similar law. It makes perfect sense to limit capacity so of course the ammosexuals are going to howl like wounded banshees any time it's proposed elsewhere in the country.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is a very sensible proposal. Therefore it will no doubt be overlooked or belittled or both by the powers that be.

    ReplyDelete

COMMENT: Ben Franklin said, "I imagine a man must have a good deal of vanity who believes, and a good deal of boldness who affirms, that all doctrines he holds are true, and all he rejects are false."